Health Worker Perspectives on Hospital Governance and Provision of Quality Spinal Injury Health Services at National Referral Spinal Injury Hospital in Kenya
Main Article Content
Abstract
Quality healthcare is a basic human right. It is a product of mutual interaction between the patient, healthcare provider and the environment of care. Quality of services delivered is often compromised due to delays which are costly to the patients and the facility. The study sought to evaluate how hospital governance influence provision of quality spinal injury health services at National tertiary public hospital in Kenya. Specifically, the study determined the influence of shared vision, responsiveness, and accountability on provision of quality health services. This was a cross sectional study guided by Donabedian model of care. A census was done on 80 clinical health workers. Data was collected using a structured questionnaire. A response rate of 78 (97.5%) was attained. Male respondents were 29 (37%), and female 49 (63%). Majority of the respondents were between (36-45) years; 36 (46%) were degree holders, and 29 (37%) diploma holders. Bivariate analysis showed that shared vision, responsiveness, and faccountability positively and significantly influenced provision of quality health services. This study recommends that, health facility management should implement governance structures, communicate the facility’s vision, nurture, and support accountability.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
I/We agree to transfer the copyright of this manuscript to the International Journal of Professional Practice (The IJPP) in the event that the manuscript is published in the Journal.
I/We give the undersigned authors of the manuscript have made the following declaration:
(a) That I/We have made substantial contribution during the conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of the data,
(b) That I/We have participated in drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content,
(c) That I/We have read and confirm the content of the manuscript and have agreed to it,
(d) That I/We have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content of the paper,
(e) That I/We give guarantee that the content of the manuscript is original, and has not beenvpublished elsewhere and is not currently being considered for publication by another journal.